🔗 Share this article Through Terminating a Harsh Tory Social Experiment, This Financial Plan Definitively Outlines How the Labour Party Will Wage the Struggle to Renew Britain Yesterday, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered a Labour budget. The public have been asking for Labour’s purpose and values to be more distinctly expressed. Through the choices made – a transition to a fairer tax system, focusing on wealth to fund addressing child poverty, good public services and the living expenses – we have clearly set out what we stand for. That’s why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the battles to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began immediately. The Main Political Divide in British Politics The primary dividing line in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to reform it so it benefits ordinary working people, and on the other, our opponents, who favor the current system and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now take on, and win, the argument. The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and instead, by every standard, they got far more dire. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, cutting off investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people after the pandemic – didn’t work. Record of Failure Under the Former Administration Living standards dropped by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty hit record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages remained flat, a housing crisis took hold, young people scarred by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The record of failure goes on. A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a long-term plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the argument for why our strategy will reap dividends. Social Security and Youth Deprivation Under the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to manage the symptoms instead of the cure. That’s why we are building more social housing than for a generation, raising wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and bringing down the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power. Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap This is also the reason we are completely justified to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap. For eight long years, since it was introduced, low-income families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work. It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral. Tangible Effects in Communities From experience from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in overcrowded, mouldy homes, parents this Christmas depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids. I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to redirect time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty. Lasting Consequences of Youth Hardship Just a quarter of pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among affluent families. This sets them up for the challenges they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults. Confronting child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the three billion pound cost of removing the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals. That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 extra children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so acting early in the parliament was crucial. The cap was a totem to 14 years of failed conservative ideology. Now it is gone. Equitable Funding for Policies We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gambling levy, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”. Conclusion Equity and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the battle of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political megaphone and set the agenda more strongly about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve certainly done that this week. So let’s maintain it and win this struggle about how we will rebuild Britain and tackle the deep inequalities impeding progress.